"Mike" wrote in message
news:48288a93$0$657$5a6aecb4@news.aaisp.net.uk...
> PDR wrote:
>>
>> In this instance it is clear that the chap had no intention of drioving
>> the vehicle on a public road (the PURPOSE of the legislation). It clearly
>> presented no danger to the public because they wouldn't have objected to
>> it had it been taxed. So they were just revenue-raising, dictatorial
>> nazis who should be turned into cattle-feed at the earliest opportunity -
>> and this leniency would only be considered for a first offence. After
>> that it would become serious.
>>
> I shouldn't like to feed rubbish like that to any cattle of mine. Ground
> up and ploughed in as manure would be OK.
Ah, but then you'd be liable to arrest and summary execution by some council
stormtrooper for unlawful disposal of hazardous waste...
PDR
|