PDR wrote:
> "Mike" wrote in message
> news:48288a93$0$657$5a6aecb4@news.aaisp.net.uk...
>> PDR wrote:
>>> In this instance it is clear that the chap had no intention of drioving
>>> the vehicle on a public road (the PURPOSE of the legislation). It clearly
>>> presented no danger to the public because they wouldn't have objected to
>>> it had it been taxed. So they were just revenue-raising, dictatorial
>>> nazis who should be turned into cattle-feed at the earliest opportunity -
>>> and this leniency would only be considered for a first offence. After
>>> that it would become serious.
>>>
>> I shouldn't like to feed rubbish like that to any cattle of mine. Ground
>> up and ploughed in as manure would be OK.
>
> Ah, but then you'd be liable to arrest and summary execution by some council
> stormtrooper for unlawful disposal of hazardous waste...
>
In that case, they're no use whatsoever.
--
Mike
|