On Tue, 13 May 2008 14:04:22 +0100, Cynic
wrote:
>On Mon, 12 May 2008 21:06:12 +0100, Alex Heney
>wrote:
>
>>>So what connection *have* you suggested?
>
>>I have suggested only that *on average*, the type of person who is
>>interested enough to look at images they know to be illegal is *more*
>>likely to be interested enough to take the further step of what is *in
>>law* regarded as .ual assault.
>
>I do not believe that the probability is any greater of a person who
>looks at child . committing an actual .ual assault than a person
>who looks at adult ..
>
My belief is different.
>>That is NOT to say they are likely to do so, just a little less
>>unlikely, nor is it to suggest they are even more likely to carry out
>>what they would see as a physical assault.
>
>>But AIUI, in most cases of . with children, the adult concerned has
>>managed to believe that the child actually wants it, so they don't
>>think of it as "assault".
>
>AIUI many rapists also believe that their victim "wanted it".
VERY many fewer.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
Never call a man a fool. Instead, borrow from him.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom |