On Tue, 13 May 2008 13:26:35 GMT, Palindrome wrote:
>Cynic wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 21:06:12 +0100, Alex Heney
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> So what connection *have* you suggested?
>>
>>> I have suggested only that *on average*, the type of person who is
>>> interested enough to look at images they know to be illegal is *more*
>>> likely to be interested enough to take the further step of what is *in
>>> law* regarded as .ual assault.
>>
>> I do not believe that the probability is any greater of a person who
>> looks at child . committing an actual .ual assault than a person
>> who looks at adult ..
>
>I find it hard to accept that you believe that.
I don't.
He is rather delusional on this subject :(
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
Never call a man a fool. Instead, borrow from him.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom |