On 13 May, 13:48, Ishtar wrote:
> On 13 May, 12:43, Mike Hughes wrote:
>
>
>
> > In message , Les Invalides
> > writes
>
> > >"We don't accept that we owe your client this money and we've told him
> > >that several times. We have invited him to take the matter to court,
> > >but he has chosen to employ a debt collector instead. We suggest you
> > >call him to ask why he has chosen not to sue."
>
> > I don't know if this a serious answer or not but just to clear up any
> > misunderstanding my friend's business is very much concerned with acting
> > within the law. Most of his clients use him as a less expensive (no win
> > no fee), specialist service instead of using solicitors.
>
> > On the other hand if your reply is to be added then thank you - it's one
> > I've not heard before.
>
> > --
> > Mike Hughes
>
> ==============================================
>
> I believe it was a completely serious reply, because I have had the
> same experience of getting billed by people to whom I do not owe
> money, and then telling them I'll see them in court.
> And because they know they cannot win in court, they try to intimidate
> me into paying by getting these debt collection agencies to send those
> threatening letters to me.
> The letters they send are highly intimidating, often reinforced by
> threatening phone calls.
> But....... if your sure you do not owe money, then stand your ground
> and just say to the debt collection agency:
> "TELL THEM TO TAKE ME TO COURT. TELL THEM I'LL SPEAK TO THEM IN A
> COURTROOM."
> Then they'll all just slink off into the night, never to be heard from
> again.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
=============================================
LET'S ALL JUST KNOCK THE SHITE OUT OF THESE FUKING DEBT COLLECTORS,
AND JUST PUT THEM BACK IN THEIR BOX. WHAT DEBT COLLECTORS NEED IS A
GOOD HARD BOOT UP THE ARSE. |