Dissenter wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 15:30:04 GMT, Palindrome wrote:
>
>> That doesn't mean that any one person chosen at random from those caught
>> with child abuse images is likely to be a significant threat. But by
>> putting all of them on the SOR, it is reducing the possibility that one
>> or more of them will carry out actual abuse.
>
> How? All it means is that they are visited at home from time to time,
> about once a year if they are considered to be 'low risk'. That leaves
> plenty of opportunity.
>
I didn't write "remove the possibility". However, ISTR that being on the
SOR has rather more impact than an annual visit - something about
"Enhanced Disclosures", not being able to follow certain professions..
Not to mention the ritual of the, "Burn out the pedo", if you are
fortunate to live in one of the more enlightened neighbourhoods..
--
Sue |