On 15 May, 20:21, Jonathan Bryce
wrote:
> Juan Kerr wrote:
> > On May 15, 4:11=A0pm, mustaphasiddi...@aol.com wrote:
>
> >> I get the impression that the claimant hasn't got a clue.Hardly
> >> the saviour of the people is he?
>
> > Well, the Defendant will ignore the Judgment........or ask to have it
> > set aside, one or the other.
>
> > So the OP hasn't achieved a "victory", moral or otherwise.
>
> The usual grounds for having a judgement set aside are that they didn't
> receive the summons.
>
> They can't use that argument if they sent a defence, so what other grounds=
> might they have?
Would you like a list of reason you can get a judgement set aside? It
will be a very long list.
Still seems like a bloody lot of hard work to have someone over for
=A350 even if the judgement doesn't get set aside.
The OP should have said he had to take his PC in to get the spam
cleaned off at =A3300 a go.
|