On Thu, 15 May 2008 11:49:39 -0700 (PDT), mustaphasiddique@aol.com
wrote:
>On 15 May, 19:19, Mike Johnson
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 May 2008 02:02:00 -0700 (PDT), mustaphasiddi...@aol.com
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On 15 May, 09:57, "Random"
>> ><1ae21b...@110101110001000011011011000100111.com> wrote:
>> >> Plus costs.
>>
>> >Minus unclaimable photocopy fees, stationary
>> >and postage. I can't see that the OP has won
>> >anything.
>>
>> I did not go to work - I did not lose any money - I got paid 50
>> pounds for going to court. A net financial win.
>>
>
>
>In that case you are looking at perjury. Give me the case number and
>I'll follow it up.
Are you trying hard to appear to be a twat - or is it just appearing
that way.
I did not go to work - I have casual employment - I do not get paid
holidays. Because I did not go to work I did not get paid - this is
commonly known as loss of earnings. I explained the circumstances
very precisely to the Judge - he accepted that I had lost a day's
earnings.
|