On Thu, 15 May 2008 08:11:55 -0700 (PDT), mustaphasiddique@aol.com
wrote:
>On 15 May, 10:39, Gareth Robert Halfacree
>wrote:
>> mustaphasiddi...@aol.com wrote:
>> > On 15 May, 09:57, "Random"
>> > <1ae21b...@110101110001000011011011000100111.com> wrote:
>> >> Plus costs.
>>
>> > Minus unclaimable photocopy fees, stationary
>> > and postage. I can't see that the OP has won
>> > anything.
>>
>> A moral victory against an immoral foe?
>
>
>But the OP has suffered a finacial loss by taking the losers
>to court even if judgement was in his favour. He didn't even
>get an injunction to stop them doing it again.
>
>I get the impression that the claimant hasn't got a clue.Hardly
>the saviour of the people is he?
Thank you for your kind words throughout the thread.
What makes you think I did it for the money?
What makes you think I haven't a clue?
What makes you think I wanted to be a People's Champion?
What makes you think I wanted to be a saviour of the people?
Doing it for the money or being a People's Champion are not things
which motive me - are they your prime motivators?
You are obviously an expert on such matters : can you please explain
how I should have applied for an injunction? Would it have cost me
anything? (NB I am not too worried about the financial aspects)
|