"Larry" wrote in message
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote:
>
>> Larry wrote:
>> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>> >> "Larry" wrote in message
>> >>> richard wrote:
>> >>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- A federal grand jury indicted a
>> >>>>> Missouri woman
>> >>>>> Thursday for her alleged role in perpetrating a hoax on the online
>> >>>>> social
>> >>>>> network MySpace against a 13-year-old neighbor who committed
>> >>>>> suicide.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ok let's clarify this a bit more. From what I have read online is,
>> >>>> the indictment has not yet been granted. It is only a request by
>> >>>> two unnamed federal agents from Los Angeles.
>> >>>
>> >>> You've read wrong. The grand jury voted the indictment already -
>> >>> as the very first sentence of the story you replied to stated.
>> >>>
>> >>> For further proof, a copy of the indictment is here:
>> >>>
>> >>> http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/05/15/my.space.drew.indictment.pd
>> >>> f
>> >>>
>> >>> (This copy does not have the grand jury foreperson's signature,
>> >>> likely to protect their anonymity.)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> The suicide, and crime took place in 2006.
>> >>>> The state of Missouri did not see there was enough evidence to
>> >>>> charge anyone with anything.
>> >>>> So now there is sufficient evidence on the federal level?
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes, because different laws are involved. Missouri authorities
>> >>> investigated the case but determined that no Missouri law applied to
>> >>> these facts. The feds investigated the case, and they determined
>> >>> that there were several federal laws that this woman violated.
>> >>>
>> >>>> Can someone please inform us under exactly which law the indictment
>> >>>> will be granted? If it is granted, I for one am gonna bitch like
>> >>>> holy hell.
>> >>>
>> >>> You always bitch, Richard. And you're always on the wrong side of
>> >>> the issue.
>> >>
>> >> ROTFLMAO !!
>> >
>> > Seriously, get help. You can't refrain from responding to a post of
>> > mine, can you?
>>
>> This from the moron Larry who's enfatuated with battling Richard for
>> the Usenet Title of the World's Most Ignorant Legal Imbecile.
>
> I think the word you're looking for is "infatuated."
Your confession is noted.
|