"Larry" wrote
> "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>> "Larry" wrote in message
>> > "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote:
>> >> Larry wrote:
>> >> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>> >> >> "Larry" wrote in message
>> >> >>> richard wrote:
>> >> >>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>> LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- A federal grand jury indicted a
>> >> >>>>> Missouri woman
>> >> >>>>> Thursday for her alleged role in perpetrating a hoax on the
>> >> >>>>> online
>> >> >>>>> social
>> >> >>>>> network MySpace against a 13-year-old neighbor who committed
>> >> >>>>> suicide.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Ok let's clarify this a bit more. From what I have read online
>> >> >>>> is,
>> >> >>>> the indictment has not yet been granted. It is only a request by
>> >> >>>> two unnamed federal agents from Los Angeles.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> You've read wrong. The grand jury voted the indictment already -
>> >> >>> as the very first sentence of the story you replied to stated.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> For further proof, a copy of the indictment is here:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/05/15/my.space.drew.indictment.
>> >> >>> pd
>> >> >>> f
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> (This copy does not have the grand jury foreperson's signature,
>> >> >>> likely to protect their anonymity.)
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> The suicide, and crime took place in 2006.
>> >> >>>> The state of Missouri did not see there was enough evidence to
>> >> >>>> charge anyone with anything.
>> >> >>>> So now there is sufficient evidence on the federal level?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Yes, because different laws are involved. Missouri authorities
>> >> >>> investigated the case but determined that no Missouri law applied
>> >> >>> to
>> >> >>> these facts. The feds investigated the case, and they determined
>> >> >>> that there were several federal laws that this woman violated.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> Can someone please inform us under exactly which law the
>> >> >>>> indictment
>> >> >>>> will be granted? If it is granted, I for one am gonna bitch like
>> >> >>>> holy hell.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> You always bitch, Richard. And you're always on the wrong side of
>> >> >>> the issue.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ROTFLMAO !!
>> >> >
>> >> > Seriously, get help. You can't refrain from responding to a post of
>> >> > mine, can you?
>> >>
>> >> This from the moron Larry who's enfatuated with battling Richard for
>> >> the Usenet Title of the World's Most Ignorant Legal Imbecile.
>> >
>> > I think the word you're looking for is "infatuated."
>>
>> Your confession is noted.
>
> If you have to "note" that you think this is a confession, then by all
> means, do so. But the fact that you have to note it demonstrates its
> not at all what you claim it to be.
You just can't stop lying, can you Larry ?
" Actually, prisons are one of the few public places where
you can still smoke."
-- Larry the moron
"Plus, receiving stolen money (or property of any kind) is only a
crime if the recipient knows it is stolen"
-- Lyin' Larry, the legal imbecile
"What do you think a "DNA Warrant" is? There is no such thing."
-- Larry the legal stooge
" [The Jury] might have unanimously found that he probably committed the
crime, or likely committed them, or possibly committed them - or that he
was in fact innocent."
-- Larry the idiot
"The jury was hung. Whether it was hung 11 for the top count and 1
for a lesser count or 1 for the top count and 11 to acquit is of no legal
relevance in terms of bail."
-- Larry the legal imbecile
"There are over 1300 ADAs in New York City alone, and
I personally know at least a half-dozen named Larry or Lawrence."
-- Larry the eponymous fool
" I don't know a single attorney, public or private,
who knows his/her attorney registration number."
-- Larry Glasser
Larry the Imbecile also claims that
0.625 grams is "far more than a gram"
and that a handcuffed man will "fall faster"
when pushed off a cliff.
|