In article <69b1qqF31s2ebU1@mid.individual.net>,
"Reality_Check©" wrote:
> "Larry" wrote
> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> >> "Larry" wrote in message
> >> > "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote:
> >> >> Larry wrote:
> >> >> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> >> >> >> "Larry" wrote in message
> >> >> >>> richard wrote:
> >> >> >>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>> LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- A federal grand jury indicted a
> >> >> >>>>> Missouri woman
> >> >> >>>>> Thursday for her alleged role in perpetrating a hoax on the
> >> >> >>>>> online
> >> >> >>>>> social
> >> >> >>>>> network MySpace against a 13-year-old neighbor who committed
> >> >> >>>>> suicide.
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Ok let's clarify this a bit more. From what I have read online
> >> >> >>>> is,
> >> >> >>>> the indictment has not yet been granted. It is only a request by
> >> >> >>>> two unnamed federal agents from Los Angeles.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> You've read wrong. The grand jury voted the indictment already -
> >> >> >>> as the very first sentence of the story you replied to stated.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> For further proof, a copy of the indictment is here:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/05/15/my.space.drew.indictme
> >> >> >>> nt.
> >> >> >>> pd
> >> >> >>> f
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> (This copy does not have the grand jury foreperson's signature,
> >> >> >>> likely to protect their anonymity.)
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>> The suicide, and crime took place in 2006.
> >> >> >>>> The state of Missouri did not see there was enough evidence to
> >> >> >>>> charge anyone with anything.
> >> >> >>>> So now there is sufficient evidence on the federal level?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Yes, because different laws are involved. Missouri authorities
> >> >> >>> investigated the case but determined that no Missouri law applied
> >> >> >>> to
> >> >> >>> these facts. The feds investigated the case, and they determined
> >> >> >>> that there were several federal laws that this woman violated.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>> Can someone please inform us under exactly which law the
> >> >> >>>> indictment
> >> >> >>>> will be granted? If it is granted, I for one am gonna bitch like
> >> >> >>>> holy hell.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> You always bitch, Richard. And you're always on the wrong side of
> >> >> >>> the issue.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> ROTFLMAO !!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Seriously, get help. You can't refrain from responding to a post of
> >> >> > mine, can you?
> >> >>
> >> >> This from the moron Larry who's enfatuated with battling Richard for
> >> >> the Usenet Title of the World's Most Ignorant Legal Imbecile.
> >> >
> >> > I think the word you're looking for is "infatuated."
> >>
> >> Your confession is noted.
> >
> > If you have to "note" that you think this is a confession, then by all
> > means, do so. But the fact that you have to note it demonstrates its
> > not at all what you claim it to be.
>
> You just can't stop lying, can you Larry ?
You can't stop replying to my posts, can you?
Post again, I command you! Good doggie. |