David Hartung wrote:
> Reality_Check© wrote:
>> "RSweeney" wrote in message
>> news:ga-dnWBEk6qtNBvVnZ2dnUVZ_oDinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> "Reality_Check©" wrote in message
>>> news:6enkmkF7vgqiU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> "David Hartung" wrote in message
>>>> news:lMqdnUkRD5e-ChvVnZ2dnUVZ_ofinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>>>>>> Gray Ghost wrote:
>>>>>>> And in so doing saved the lives of many more people by forcing
>>>>>>> the Japanese out of the war.
>>>>>> Complte BULLSHIT apologia.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So it would be ok for another nation to nuke a major U$ city, if
>>>>>> they believed it would "save more lives" from their point of
>>>>>> view, eh numbnuts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your absence of morality is repugnant. May your family be the
>>>>>> first to suffer from it.
>>>>> Truman, using the information he had available at the time,
>>>>> determined that the use of nuclear weapons would bring the War to
>>>>> an end without the necessity of invading the Japanese Home
>>>>> Islands.
>>>> So it was done for expedience, easier for the U$$A.
>>>>
>>>>> Given the record of the war, it is likely that doing so not only
>>>>> saved thousands of American lives, but also Japanese lives.
>>>> Utterly bullshit speculation.
>>>>
>>>>> Why is this a bad thing?
>>>> If deliberately dropping NUCLEAR BOMBS upon civilian population
>>>> centers -- TWICE --
>>>> killing 100,000+ innocent civilians, women and children in the
>>>> process isn't a "bad thing"
>>>> in your world, then you really should be in the dock ahead of
>>>> Karadzic, you repugnant
>>>> piece of crap.
>>> Better we killed millions of Japanese men women and children with
>>> M1's and naval bombardment than killed a few tens of thousands with
>>> two nukes.
>>
>> Only someone as depraved and perverted of spirit as you would
>> do either.
>
> What would have been thre proper solution then?
One thing is for certain, it would have entailed dropping NUCLEAR BOMBS
on CIVILIAN population centers ... TWICE!
|