On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:29:57 +0200
abelard wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:46:08 +0100, Rob Morley
> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:30:40 +0200
> >abelard wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:04:35 +0100, "Paul Nutteing (valid email
> >> address in post script )" wrote:
> >>
> >> >Its official
> >> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7523144.stm
> >> >
> >> >"Someone must have picked it up and walked off with it," he said.
> >>
> >> i take you're an expert....
> >
> >It's not necessary to be an expert in order to see the blatantly
> >obvious.
>
> you mean obvious to career thieves of course....
> ie, socialists....
I mean obvious to anyone who is aware of the prevalence of certain
types of property crime in certain areas.
>
> >> and several others contributing....
> >>
> >> why don't you set up giving advice to the public
> >> it may be more profitable....
> >
> >All advice here is freely given to those who ask. Profit sounds
> >like a Tory motive.
>
> no, capitalists provide a service...socialist just steal.....
> or vote for governments that will steal for them.....
Capitalists want personal profit from everything, socialists want
society as a whole to profit from available resources.
>
> in the meanwhile of course you have offered no advice.....
What advice was requested?
>
> >> >What sort of moron loosely chains a bike to a bollard ?
> >>
> >> ah yes, it is the victim's fault....you must be a socialist....
> >>
> >I thought it was the Tories who espoused "every man for himself",
> >market opportunism, exploitation of resources for personal gain ...
>
> no, that's socialists like mugabe....
Mugabe isn't a socialist, he's a nutter.
>
> > A
> >socialist would seek to rehabilitate the thief while making sure that
> >the victim received support and a bike to ride to work on.
>
> not at all, the thief is the obvious victim in your world.....
If it really was my world thieves would be birched, repeat offenders
would be transported to the colonies.
> the person who lost the bike is obviously the capitalist who had the
> cheek to be able to afford it by exploiting the thief....and his
> family of course....
Don't you think that's a very silly thing to say to someone who has
several quite expensive bikes?
>
> after all, that is the case you socialists are trying to sell....
>
What makes you think I'm a socialist?
|