On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:52:26 GMT, Periander <4rubbish@britwar.co.uk>
wrote:
>"Janitor of Lunacy" wrote in
>news:5u7ik.31$zA7.1@newsfe28.ams2:
>
>> Periander wrote:
>...
>>>>
>>>> I still think it is a borderline case though. It is rather hard to
>>>> shoehorn this into the definition of "proceeds of crime".
>>>
>>> Tran.ual ... obtaining property by deception? :-)
>>
>> R v Sullivan, R v Laverty :- the deception has to be the operative
>> means of the obtaining.
>
>Nice to see you following me around shame you haven't got anything better
>to do, tell you what, you could usefully spend a few minutes looking up the
>meaning of "Sense of Humour"
And then post it here so you can read about other people's
experiences?
MM |