abelard wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:41:56 +0200, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:08:20 +0200, abelard
>> said in :
>>
>>>> ROFLMAO! The union of (socialists) and (Nulaborites(TM)) is and
>>>> always has been the null set.
>>
>>> and there speaks the prototypical socialist....
>>
>> Really? Perhaps you can point me to the posting where I advocated
>> state ownership and administration of the means of production and
>> distribution of goods and services.
>
> all socialist lie and obfuscate...other than those who are
> too stupid to understand the real nature of their cult....
>
>> Oh, wait, you can't, because I did not, thus rendering your point
>> fatuous and utterly wrong.
>
> not at all....you've temporarily pretended to give up one dogma of
> your cult...and seek your objective by other means....
> meanwhile you've renationalised the railways....you've nationalised
> a major bank....
> and you're attempting to turn the whole of society into government
> clients and supplicants....
>
> nothing has changed....
> just the tinsel on the packet and this years lies....
>
>> Or perhaps you are using "socialist" in the sense that American
>> neocons use "liberal", meaning one who thinks Margaret Thatcher is a
>> communist.
>
> not at all...the usa is fortunate in not having a real leftist party..
> though another cultist is now seeking, through rabble rousing,
> to sell your disgusting cult....
Good Lord! I think this one may be madder than Em Eye V Mike.
--
Charles Exford
Oxton
|