Deadrat wrote:
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote
>> Deadrat wrote:
>>> "Reality_Check©" wrote in
>>>> "Deadrat" wrote in message
>>>>> DanielSan wrote in
>>>>>> RSweeney wrote:
>>>>>>> "DanielSan" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> Paul Hyett wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 at 22:22:29, Reality_Check©
>>>>>>>>> wrote in uk.legal :
>>>>>>>>>>> Better we killed millions of Japanese men women and children
>>>>>>>>>>> with M1's and
>>>>>>>>>>> naval bombardment than killed a few tens of thousands with
>>>>>>>>>>> two nukes.
>>>>>>>>>> Only someone as depraved and perverted of spirit as you would
>>>>>>>>>> do either.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Remind us - which side *started* the hostilities?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes. The United States was doing nothing at all. We were
>>>>>>>> twiddling our thumbs, minding our own business when we were
>>>>>>>> attacked. We are absolutely 100% innocent and blameless. We
>>>>>>>> did nothing at all to Japan.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you are saying the Japanese aggression in China should have
>>>>>>> been supported and assisted by the US?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. I am not making a judgment call on the response to Pearl
>>>>>> Harbor. I am just making sure that people know that we WEREN'T
>>>>>> blameless either. I mean, it's not like Japan just said out of
>>>>>> the blue, "Oh, let's attack America." There was a reason behind
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You seem confused as to the meaning of the word "blame." That our
>>>>> national
>>>>> policy gave Japan strategic reasons to attack us does not mean
>>>>> that our policy is blameworthy.
>>>>
>>>> Did Kent Wills help you prepare that pathetic poppycock?
>>>
>>> This whole Pacific Theater of War thread is disingenuous even by
>>> your standards.
>>
>> You're lying again, ratzo.
>
> Why? Because I've got the wrong estimate of your standards?
>
> You're being disingenuous, prof.
You're lying again, ratzo.
>
> Are you enjoying the resulting spectacle?
Jealous ?
|