Cynic wrote in
news:kg31945as4vskiqi4jhr1agqj3cltp22gj@4ax.com:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:12:40 -0500, grey_ghost471-newsgroups@yahoo.com
> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>
>>> It is an after-the-fact rationalisation that makes a number of
>>> assumptions, any one of which may be wrong. Why *two* bombs? One
>>> would have achieved the purpose you ascribe.
>
>>Well they didn't, now did they?
>
> Might have done, had it been given more time.
Before or after Hyushu was invaded leaving 1 million US servicemen, Japanese
serviemen and civillians dead?
>
>>> I'm sure that the terrorists who were responsible for flying airliners
>>> into the WTC have convinced themselves that it was for the ultimate
>>> good. The ends justify the means.
>
>>So you think Hirshima justifies 9/11?
>
> No, but I think that your comprehension skills are lacking.
>
You are the one mentioning Hiroshima and 9/11 in the same sentence. Apprently
you think there is some connection, no?
Most real Americans think of Pearl Harbor in association with 9/11.
Frank
--
Title 18 > Chapter 115 > § 2381 Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or
adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United
States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be
imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less
than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United
States |