On 3 Oct, 13:16, "Richard Bird"
wrote:
> "Alasdair" wrote in message
>
> news:40kce4dglpismg9k14k5fg4f2fq9k20fra@4ax.com...
>
> > On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 14:39:56 +0100, "The Todal"
> > wrote:
>
> >>Smacking a child for "talking" is .ing barbaric,
>
> > "Talking" in this context almost certainly means talking to a fellow
> > pupil probably about nothing to do with schoolwork. =A0A persistent
> > talker can be quite disruptive especially if he talks in a loud voice.
> > What is your remedy? Put him out of the classroom?
>
> > --
> > Alasdair.
>
> Smacking a child for "talking" is .ing barbaric
>
> So is children beating up/knifeing and raping pensioners but it happens a=
nd
> not a lot is done about it because after all they are only children and t=
hey
> dont mean any harm "bless e'm"
I DONT BELIVE IN SMAKING A CHILD. |