"mert1639" wrote:
>
>"Edster" wrote in message
>news:09gke4pfo5jbdt7e5lhdjojo8talq7nsvo@4ax.com...
>> Webmanager_CritEst wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Oct 6, 5:08 pm, Edster wrote:
>>>> Webmanager_CritEst wrote:
>>>> >On Oct 6, 12:37 am, Edster wrote:
>>>> >> "mert1639" wrote:
>>>> >> >Beacuse it is unlikely that a member of the public attending the
>>>> >> >event would
>>>> >> >be showing children arround the cab of an engine and using that time
>>>> >> >to
>>>> >> >abuse them.
>>>>
>>>> >> Do all pedofiles suffer from premature ejaculation? They would have
>>>> >> to
>>>> >> be pretty quick to . them before the next kid in line poked their
>>>> >> head into the cab.
>>>>
>>>> >Edster, you are near to being plonked.
>>>>
>>>> >WM
>>>>
>>>> Why? It's a valid enough question. How can anyone . anything in the
>>>> short time you would have between train engine visits? That would be a
>>>> crap place to look for victims.
>>>
>>>He .ed no one.
>>>
>>>WM
>>
>> But that is the fear that the event organisers have, and the reason
>> that such demonstrations have been stopped. In case it might happen.
>> My point is that it is not very likely to, even if all the event staff
>> were pedofiles.
>>
>He touched the child. Plenty of time to do that on an engine.
>
Have you ever been in a train cab? There's not a lot of room to
maneuver in them, so if it was full of kids leaping around pulling
levers it would be difficult not to touch one. |