"Norman Wells" wrote in message
news:Lk94l.19313$9U2.15973@newsfe17.ams2...
> Nomen Nescio wrote:
>> Darcy <> wrote in news:j5v1l41idglntucjdqln7fkn9me989vj05@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:30:08 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We took our child to see a 'Santa' today.
>>>>
>>>> On the outside of the Grotto, there was no indication of any pricing
>>>> required to meet 'Santa'.
>>>>
>>>> Once we got inside, the tariff list was at the far end of the queue,
>>>> around three feet before 'Santa'.
>>>>
>>>> As there was a reasonable expectation that no charge would be
>>>> levied, as no charge was listed on either the exterior or entrance
>>>> 'queue system', would the event runners be legally able to enforce
>>>> requirement for payment?
>>>>
>>>> For those who are interested, we did not pay, we simply left without
>>>> visiting this 'Santa'.
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks
>>> Bet that cheered the kid up you tight git
>>>
>>
>> Ad hominum
>
> Go to the bottom of the class.
>
> Come back when you can decline hominis, and know the cases prepositions
> take.
>
> In the meantime, don't try to impress us in languages with which you are
> obviously unfamiliar.
>
So the poster mistyped or misspelt 'hominem'. Since you never get the
fundamentals right in your own posts, you are hardly in a position to
correct others typos.
|