On Jul 3, 11:28=A0pm, Jethro wrote:
> On 3 July, 22:24, Webmanager_CritEst wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 3, 10:21=A0pm, Jethro wrote:
>
> > > On 3 July, 22:11, Ian wrote:
>
> > > > On 3 July, 21:37, shaun.jameson.s...@ntlwolrd.com (Shaun) wrote:
>
> > > > > On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:33:04 -0700 (PDT), Webmanager_CritEst
> > > > > >Parents have been banned from attending their children's sports =
day in
> > > > > >an extraordinary measure to protect pupils from child abductors =
and
> > > > > >paedophiles.
>
> > > > > Yet they see nothing wrong with the same parents taking the child=
ren
> > > > > home, stripping them naked , and giving them a bath.
>
> > > > They weren't worried about the parents. They were worried about oth=
er
> > > > adults gaining access.
>
> > > > Ian
>
> > > I must admit, with the hundreds of kids who went missing with complet=
e
> > > strangers from school during school hours in the last month alone,
> > > this was a sensible precaution.
>
> > ?
>
> Whoosh
This issue is nothing to do with 'predators' (quasi or not), it is
about the school watching its back, under piles of poorly-defined,
'safeguarding' documentation, following the Bichard Inquiry.
The only person to keep out is the caretaker.
WM |