On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:25:12 +0100, molley222
wrote:
>>IANAL, but ISTM that it would be perfectly reasonable to assume that
>>an order placed two years previously, and of which there has been no
>>further communication has been cancelled. In your position I would
>>try to get my bank/card provider to claw back the money on the grounds
>>that they have taken the money without authorisation. The address the
>>vendor supplied to the card provider will not be correct, lending
>>weight to the notion that it was an unauthorised withdrawal.
>
>It would have been correct when the Op ordered and it would have been
>the Op who put his payment details on play's system
>
>How would that be fraudulent ?
Firstly, the address would not have been correct at the time the money
was taken from the card. Secondly the fraud is in the fact that money
was taken for a transaction that had effectively been cancelled long
ago.
--
Cynic
|