Passports: HOME | EUROPE | AMERICAS, AUSTRALIA and OCEANIA | ASIA | AFRICA | OTHER DOCUMENTS
National Anthems:[ www.national-anthems.net ] ++
Travel:[ Europe ] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ more ]
[ Australia legal ] [ U.K. legal ] [ U.S. visa ] [ Immigration ] [ Marriage based U.S visa ]



Subject: Re: Speedbumps and damage to cars Posted on: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 08:24:38 +0000 (UTC)

"Peter Hucker" wrote in news:op.u21g1lhq4buhsv@i7:

> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:00:04 -0000, Geoff
> wrote:
>
>> Peter Hucker wrote:
>>> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:32:25 -0000, Geoff
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:22:26 -0000, johannes
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bod wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> johannes wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Peter Hucker wrote:
>>>>>>> >> If you drove a sports car over speedbumps at the speed limit,
>>>>>>> you'd wreck it after only a few bumps. Could you then sue the
>>>>>>> council? My Golf is happy to go over them at more than the
>>>>>>> speed limit, but I frequently see sporty cars having to take
>>>>>>> them at less than 5mph.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > It is an old chestnut. Speed humps has to conform with strict
>>>>>>> specifications;
>>>>>>> > height, angles, warning signs. If they don't conform, then you
>>>>>>> > have
>>>>>>> a good case
>>>>>>> > for suing the council.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On long 'rat run' roads where there are multiple
>>>>>>> humps, wouldn't it make more sense to remove the
>>>>>>> humps and put "average speed cameras"
>>>>>>> at each end of the road, with say, a 20mph limit?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That way, any emergency services won't have to
>>>>>>> slow down at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But low limits are often ignored.
>>>>>
>>>>> Average speed cameras are not.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Speed humps are ok with me as long as
>>>>>> they're only used on roads leading into residential areas.
>>>>>
>>>>> And if you live there, your mechanics bill will be massive.
>>>>
>>>> I have 3 of them in my road. My car is 4 years old and the
>>>> suspension is fine. Maybe it's because I drive properly?
>>>
>>> Or annoyingly slowly.
>>>
>>
>> There's your problem.
>
> Why the . should I have to spend all day going slowly over things
> instead of being at my destination?
>
>>> Plus your car is quite new.
>>>
>>
>> Rubbish. Old cars must have good suspension or they wouldn't have an
>> MOT.
>
> An MOT does not mean the car is in good condition.

Faulty suspension is an MOT fail.
1765403. Re: The IAPT, CBT Experiment - A Deadly Mistake? 1765403
1765405. Re: The IAPT's CBT "Therapy" Could Lead To Deaths 1765405
1765410. Re: Protection from abuse in customer facing positions 1765410
1765417. Potential judges will not have to declare if they are Freemasons 176
1765420. Re: Bonfire Night Is No More 1765420
1765425. Re: Bonfire Night Is No More 1765425
1765444. Re: The IAPT, CBT Experiment - A Deadly Mistake? 1765444
1765448. Re: The IAPT, CBT Experiment - A Deadly Mistake? 1765448
1765460. Re: The IAPT, CBT Experiment - A Deadly Mistake? 1765460
1765532. I'm happy that Henry and William Windsor are sons of the bitch lady
1765545. Another attempt to repress a peaceful Animal Rights protest. 1765545
1765551. "Scotland Yard riot squad faces calls to end 'culture of impunity'"
1765560. Re: The Beatles and MP3 players 1765560
1765564. Re: Another pavement killer. 1765564
1765567. Re: More peaceful protest arrests. 1765567
1765575. Re: Bonfire Night Is No More 1765575
1765576. Re: Where's Nigel? 1765576
1765578. Re: Another crash into a building by a pavement motorist. 1765578
1765579. Re: Where's Nigel? 1765579
1765581. Re: Another crash into a building by a pavement motorist. 1765581