Passports: HOME | EUROPE | AMERICAS, AUSTRALIA and OCEANIA | ASIA | AFRICA | OTHER DOCUMENTS
National Anthems:[ www.national-anthems.net ] ++
Travel:[ Europe ] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ more ]
[ Australia legal ] [ U.K. legal ] [ U.S. visa ] [ Immigration ] [ Marriage based U.S visa ]



Subject: Re: Captive British Sailors - What Would You Do? Posted on: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:27:36 +0000

On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:18:28 +0000, Ian Jackson
wrote:

>>It took me about 5 minutes using a ham radio set on a small yacht 700
>>miles offshore to be speaking with an appropriate person in the US
>>coastguard. (In that case nothing worse than a very large buoy that
>>was adrift and a danger to shipping. The buoy was recovered within 36
>>hours.)

>Presumably you initially made contact with some radio amateur
>(somewhere), and he then set the wheels in motion by phoning the US
>coastguard etc. It obviously wasn't certain 'GLK London'!
>http://www.southgatearc.org/news/june2007/hancock.htm

LOL - yes I recall that episode from my childhood when the series of
"Hancock's half-hour" was originally aired!

The ham I contacted was able to use his "phone patch" equipment to
allow me to speak to the coast guard directly via his landline. Apart
from the danger to navigation, the buoy in question was a research
buoy that had broken free of its mooring and was worth many hundreds
of thousands of dollars, and so they were very pleased to find it. We
happened to come across the ship that recovered it on its way back to
port (in fact they deliberately diverted slightly to say, "Thanks" to
us), and I had a long radio conversation with them. Apparently the
storm that had caused the buoy to be set adrift a month or so
previously had also damaged its satellite aerial so they had not been
able to track it, but they stated that its internal recorders had not
been affected and the buoy had gathered data that might prove more
valuable than the data it would have gathered had it remained where it
was supposed to be.

It was a steel cylindrical buoy about 10 meters in diameter (that's
*huge*) and rose around 3 meters from the water to its deck, with a
(damaged) tower and aerial array above that. Fortunately we had come
across it just after sunrise, because it was unlit and a collision
would have caused us some very severe damage.

--
Cynic
1808617. Re: The case for '3 strikes and you're out'? 1808617
1808618. Re: Captive British Sailors - What Would You Do? 1808618
1808619. Re: And yet another good reason to restrict immigration... 1808619
1808620. Re: Parking and yellow lines question 1808620
1808621. Re: Ali Oops! 1808621
1808622. Re: Another good reason to restrict immigrants? 1808622
1808623. Re: Having turned 65.....is 13 quid per yr state pension fair 180862
1808624. Re: Police stop church photographer under terrorism powers 1808624
1808625. Re: Beyond a joke 1808625
1808626. Re: Failed to provide a breath specimen 1808626
1808627. Re: Having turned 65.....is 13 quid per yr state pension fair 180862
1808628. Re: Ali Oops! 1808628
1808629. Re: How many die later from serious injuries on our roads? 1808629
1808630. Re: Another good reason to restrict immigrants? 1808630
1808631. Re: Pension insult....exchange rate eats 50% of old age pension award
1808632. Re: Ali Dizaei found guilty. 1808632
1808633. Re: How the Guardian misleads and lies 1808633
1808634. Re: Another good reason to restrict immigrants? 1808634
1808635. Re: Failed to provide a breath specimen 1808635
1808636. Re: Beyond a joke 1808636